February 4, 2010

Why? Why not.

This is my new favourite website. It offers no information. It serves no purpose. It’s just there. All you need is a picture of Tom Selleck, a sandwich, a waterfall and Photoshop.

Enjoy.

Posted by Dana Minter


February 2, 2010

Will the small idea replace the big idea?

Now there’s a question for you to ponder. For decades, manufacturers and marketers have been thinking big: first, they come up with a popular product and then brief the agency to come up with definitive big campaign idea.

However, today the notion of the big ( USP – based ) idea is changing fast – new mediums allow us to think smaller, with the ability to speak more directly and perhaps more honestly with our target markets.

Instead of selling hard, we have new options – we can allow consumers to decide what product they want, or don’t want, involve them in the product testing process, give them a voice, speak to them more personally, allow them to comment and share their views ( and discuss ) with other consumers.  In the “old” days, it was called soft sell, although now it might be more accurately described as personalised marketing.

This has also allowed manufactures to expand their bases, chasing new customers who might have been beyond the one size fits all approach. In addition to the mass market products, they now have the opportunity to experiment more, broaden their ranges and discover a new breed of customer.

One example is Mountain Dew, who invited customers to comment on the colours and flavours of a new range of drinks.  And, a recently launched Victorian brewer, did much the same thing and allowed beer drinkers to effectively become part of the product testing team and decide what the final beer, called Nelson, should taste like.

John Willshire of, Head of Innovation at PMD Media in London, recently discussed some interesting ideas on this subject in a talk  – “How Do You Socialize Production?”  He explains how technology is really turning our notion of big idea thinking., upside down.

Naturally, this means that we creative marketers have to really think outside the square, more than ever. If we don’t have to talk to everyone at once, we can speak to a few more intimately.

In other words, I think it’s time to start thinking small.

Posted by Ian Minter

Technorati Claim Token: N9PSKY8WYEWG

January 25, 2010

Using YouTube

Like every communication medium, YouTube can be an incredibly powerful marketing tool, one that is still being explored by creators all over the world. And, just like every medium, it’s effectiveness invariably depends on how well it’s used.

Last year, I saw a ‘5 Seeds Cider’ campaign via Mumbrella – it’s about an interactive YouTube concept, using a facility that allows consumers to choose to go from one video link to another. Which means they are given options, and can decide which way to go next.

Back to the 5 Seeds Cider (a Tooheys brand), devised by BMF and digital agency Holler. I checked it out and, I’m sorry to say, I quickly became bored. It was beautifully shot, but I found it self-indulgent and pretty dull.

In contrast, the same YouTube video linking facility has also been used for a campaign by the Metropolitan Police in the UK. It focuses on the dangers of carrying a knife – ‘Choose a Different Ending’.

This was compulsive viewing for me. I couldn’t resist following all the links, including ‘Take The Knife’ or ‘Don’t Take The Knife’. The interactive film allows the viewer to follow different story paths, and discover what might happen if you carry a knife (or choose not to).

It’s a beautiful execution of a strong idea and very thought providing. Plenty of UK viewers have debated whether the films are racist, and other suggest that the police appear to use the law to search anyone without good reason.

Regardless of the controversy, there’s no doubt that the campaign demonstrates how powerful this YouTube video switching concept can be. I can’t wait to see how it’s going to be used next.

Posted by Ian Minter

January 15, 2010

Would you let a teenage schoolboy write your marketing campaign?

It looks like Fernwood Women’s Health Clubs might have sought the advice of sniggering schoolboys to create their latest ad campaign.

How else can you explain the screaming headline “Join for Fox Sake” ? Featured not just on their website , but on massive outdoor posters!

It’s a wince -making pun, it’s not funny (unless you’re male aged 12 – 15), it’s un-original and, worst of all, it’s likely to alienate their potential clients, which I’d imagine are likely to be adult females, probably aged 25 plus.

Or, more likely, 35 plus.

Even if you ignore the sad pun, the sentiment that you should, in effect, join Fernwood for F**k’s sake, is offensive all by itself. We could follow this up with “Join Fernwood or fox off”, or “Join Fernwood or get foxed”. The possibilities for schoolyard creativity are endless.

While not a keen observer of Fernwood’s marketing communication strategy, I seem to recall that it’s always looked a bit stuffy in the past and maybe someone thought it was time to lower the target market demographic (the MD’s son perhaps?).

To be honest, it’s all a bit cringe -making.  How many women still describe themselves as “ foxy” (other than Kath and Kim)?  Then again, maybe their customers are so old they still use words like “foxy”, groovy” and ”far out”

This campaign is so wrong, it’s hard to believe that it exists at all. Really, Fernwood’s, what the Fox  were you thinking?

Posted by Ian Minter

January 13, 2010

Terror Alerts

A friend sent this to me via email. I don’t know where it originated (if I find it I will attribute it later). It’s got absolutely nothing to do with advertising, but it’s worth a laugh.

Revision to Terror Alerts Worldwide

The English are feeling the pinch in relation to recent terrorist threats  and have raised their security level from “Miffed” to “Peeved”. Soon,  though, security levels may be raised yet again to “Irritated” or even “A Bit Cross”. The English have not been “A Bit Cross” since the blitz in  1940 when tea supplies all but ran out. Terrorists have been re-categorized  from “Tiresome” to a “Bloody Nuisance”. The last time the British issued a “Bloody Nuisance” warning level was in 1588 when threatened by the Spanish Armada.

The Scots raised their threat level from “Pissed Off” to “Let’sGet the Bastards”. They don’t have any other levels. This is the reason they have  been used on the front line of the British army for the last 300 years.

The French government announced yesterday that it has raised its terror  alert level from “Run” to “Hide”. The only two higher levels in France are “Collaborate” and “Surrender”. The rise was precipitated by a
recent fire that destroyed France’s white flag factory, effectively paralyzing the  country’s military capability. It’s not only the French who are on a heightened level of alert.

Italy has increased the alert level from “Shout Loudly and Excitedly” to “Elaborate Military Posturing”. Two more levels  remain: “Ineffective Combat Operations” and “Change Sides”.

The Germans also increased their alert state from “Disdainful Arrogance” to “Dress in Uniform and Sing Marching Songs”. They also have two higher levels: “Invade a Neighbour” and “Lose”.

Belgians, on the other hand, are all on holiday as usual, and the only threat they are worried about is NATO pulling out of Brussels.

The Spanish are all excited to see their new submarines ready to deploy.  These beautifully designed subs have glass bottoms so the new Spanish navy can get a really good look at the old Spanish navy.

Americans meanwhile and as usual are carrying out pre-emptive strikes, on all of their allies, just in case. And in the southern hemisphere…

New Zealand has also raised its security levels – from “baaa” to “BAAAA!”. Due to continuing defense cutbacks (the air force being a squadron of  spotty teenagers flying paper airplanes and the navy some toy boats in the Prime Minister’s bath), New Zealand only has one more level of escalation,  which is “I Hope Those Bloody Australians Will Come and Rescue Us”.

Australia , meanwhile, has raised its security level from “No Worries” to  “She’ll Be Right,Mate”. Three more escalation levels remain: “Crikey!’,  “I Think We’ll Need to Cancel the Barbie This Weekend” and “The Barbie is Cancelled”. So far no situation has ever warranted use of the final escalation level.

Posted by Dana Minter

December 10, 2009

Try Before You Buy Tattoos

I really like this – a tattoo parlour is advertising by placing stickers on mirrors in public loos in the US.  Nice, simple and memorable (just don’t have a few to drink and make a decision you may regret to get a real one).

This comes via Copyranter.

Posted by Dana Minter

November 24, 2009

Our name is engraved on a Walkley Award!

No, we haven’t won a prestigious Walkley Award. However, our name is on one for posterity – as a sponsor of the Walkley Foundation, we are proud to be presenting the award in the category of “Outstanding Coverage of an Issue or Event.”

We’re looking forward to the night – however, the Walkleys provided us with a ’sneak peak’ via their Twitter account (our name is one one of these!).

November 6, 2009

The evolution of a brand

SmokeySmokey the Bear is the longest running public service campaign in America. I’m originally from Canada and so I am very familiar with the character. Smokey is a cartoon….well, bear of course. And he teaches children (and hopefully adults) how to prevent forest fires.

Smokey seems to have been born in 1944 after a series of rather menacing ads and posters (“Death Rides the Forest when Man is Careless!”) His gentle, tutorial manner of teaching fire prevention has proven to be extremely successful and is one of the best known characters in advertising history.

I’m all for evolution (and occasionally revolution) of a brand. However, I love the fact that this icon has remained true to character for over 60 years.

Visit Smokey’s website to see how the campaign has changed.

Posted by Dana Minter

November 6, 2009

Is This the Worst Ad Ever?

eagleI think this is it - the worse ad ever, that is. I found this from Twitter via @SimonThomsen and @ChasLicc, and it’s a classic.

Posted by Dana Minter

November 4, 2009

Who says Graduate Recruitment ads are dull?

grad-ad

We’ve worked on quite a few Graduate Recruitment campaigns over the years, and we think we’ve forged new ground in the category. However, this viral ad is one of the best we’ve seen.

But then, you’d expect it to be – it’s by award winning UK advertising agency BBH for their client – award winning UK advertising agency BBH.  (It’s a brief every creative would love to get their hands on.)

Posted by Dana Minter